Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Advertisement

Responsive Advertisement

History of Companies and Jurisdictions of courts

 

History Companies 

11th to 16th-century

The idea of the corporation was laid by Roman Law. During, 11th and 16th-century merchants had a Merchant Guild (group of people with the same thoughts or interests) in England who securing their right to a monopoly from the Crown through the charters. They were having joint accounts for their trades and the members were bound to follow rules made by the Guilds. Their model of trade was working in two forms. Commenda and Societas. In the Islamic world, Sharikah and Mudarabah.

Commenda: In commenda the liability of the workers was unlimited and of the investor was limited to his investment amount which means he lost just his investment in case of the total loss. In the Islamic world, the Sharikah similar to the commenda had contrary rule the liability of the worker was limited.  Later on, the commenda developed into a limited liability partnership.

Societas: In societas, all the members were participating in the business. The societas developed into modern partnerships.

The trading merchant members used the word company for overseas trade for the first time.

16th – 1825

In the 16th century associations named as companies formed in a real sense in England, after the Tudor monarch granted charters of incorporations to many companies. In the 17th century companies started trading on behalf of merchants each contributing as a part of the merchandise. Such corporation was known as Joint Stock Trading and by the end of the century; these companies had developed permanently fixed capitals portrayed by the freely tradable shares. Yet, the property of the company was in the exclusive control of the board of governors. Method of incorporation at this time was made by Royal Charter and by Act of the Parliament.

1720

The Bubble Act brought severity against the companies during  1720. The reason to bring this Act was the occurrence of the South Sea Bubble. The South Sea Company assumed Britain’s national debt and received in return a monopoly over the British trade with the South Sea Islands in South America, also gained an annual interest payment. The shares of the company were driven up by speculation and fraud was exposed.  The Bubble Act as a consequence was introduced that curtailed the use of Joint Stock Companies for hundred of years. Due to this fraud and collapse organizations resembling corporations were regarded with suspension in England as well as in the USA. This era is called fear of companies.

The restrictions were made on the use of corporations unless confirmed by royal Charter or Parliamentary Act.The Act did not lead to the suppression of the form of the companies. Unincorporated associations started forming that were not more than large partnerships whose constitution was introduced in their deeds of settlement and much use was made of it in the formation of the trust. The members of such companies had unlimited liability. 

1825 to 1844

With the year 1825, the modern form of companies started forming when the Bubble Act was repealed. During the two-decade of this century, the civil proceeding started brought by the defendant sought to escape liability under the deed of settlement of an unincorporated company by relying on the Bubble Act that manifested the uncertainties and the unfair results of the Act. Thereby the Act was repealed in 1825. After repealing the Act there wasn’t any cheap and speedy method for the establishment of the companies. It was according to the laws made by the courts that made unincorporated companies lawful associations in the common law and shares could have been transferring freely. To get the factor of limited liability the companies were entering into contracts that provided that only the capital contributed would be liable for the debts.

1844

The Joint Stock Company Act, 1844 prohibited the large incorporated companies and allowed joint-stock companies by registration. Later on, limited Liability of the companies was declared by the Limited Liability Act, 1855. The first Indian Company Act for the Subcontinent was also legislated in this Decca, 1850. In 1857 an Act was passed that extended the privileges of limited liability to joint-stock companies, except banking and insurance companies. However, the problem arose whether a company can be sue?

1856-1910

The Companies Act 1862 was the first Act that consolidated with the earlier Acts. It was given shape in India in the form of the Company Act of 1860 that was recast in 1882. Amendments were made to Act in 1891 and 1895. The most beneficial amendment in this Act was brought in the form of introduction to the private companies.

1913-1984

In India Companies Act 1913 was introduced which was followed by furthermore Acts such as The companies (Foreign Interest) Act, 1918, and the Companies (Amendment)Act, 1930. 

History of Companies Legislation in Pakistan

After the partition, Pakistan followed the Companies Act, 1958 for a long period. Then it enacted the Exchange Ordinance, 1969, the Securities and Exchange Ordinance, 1969, the Companies (Managing Agency and Election of Directors) order, 1972, and the Companies (Shifting of Registered Office) Ordinance 1972. The Commission establishes a report on Company Law Reforms in 1961 that was mostly based upon Indian reports. All previous laws were repealed by the Companies Ordinance, 1969 only Securities and Exchange Ordinance, 1969 was left (its 1-15 sections were repealed). The ordinance allowed single-member companies. The process of law reform was commenced with the publication of a concept paper and after a long debate and drawn process a new Act is legislated named; the Companies Act, 2017.  

Jurisdiction of the Court and the Company Law

Section 5 of the ordinance deals with the jurisdiction of the court to deal with the matters relayed to the company. The section gives the jurisdiction to the High Court which has its original jurisdiction. The High Court has the jurisdiction even to the matters of the company where the question of jurisdiction is not clear. The civil courts do have jurisdiction related to the matters of companies which the High Court is empowered to determine.

Section 6 of the Companies Ordinance, empowers the Chief Justice of the High Court to constitute a Company Bench that will exercise the jurisdiction conferred on the High Court. This section fixes time for the expeditious disposal of cases that should not extend beyond 120 days. 6(11) subsection also provides a detailed procedure for all petitions including the electronic serving process. The section also permits the courts to take the proceedings on a day-to-day basis and has also allowed the court to fines one thousand rupees per day or higher as the court feels fit for any delay causing by the parties. 6(15) Except the court determined in its discretion, the Qanun-e-Shahadat ordinance and Code of Civil Procedure shall not apply to the proceeding related to the company. 6(14) The appeals related to the matters of the companies will be applied to the Supreme Court within 60 days after the final decision of the High Court yet no appeal can lie against the interlocutory order of the court.

  Reference: Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee, M.Ibrahim Abdullah Khan Nayazee, Company Law 2019

 

Post a Comment

0 Comments